The Vendor AI Census
Training rights, change-notice windows, and AI subprocessor churn — measured across the vendors Driftline monitors and published as a dated, reproducible, aggregates-only edition. No vendor is named.
Whether a vendor's terms permit training on customer data, permit it with an opt-out, prohibit it, or say nothing at all.
How much advance notice a vendor commits to before changing the terms that govern your data, how many state no window, and how many make no proactive-notice commitment at all.
How many vendor–AI-subprocessor pairs newly appear on the subprocessor lists your contracts flow down to.
Every figure reflects what vendors commit to in their own published terms of service, privacy policies, DPAs, subprocessor lists and AI disclosures — not survey answers or self-attestation.
A vendor counts as permitting or prohibiting training, or as stating a change-notice window, only where its own wording clearly says so. Unclear cases are left out, not guessed.
"Silent" means no statement on training was found in the documents assessed. Silent vendors count toward the denominator; ambiguous ones do not.
Paste your vendor list and confirm your email, and we build your report and email it to you — the material changes across your vendors in the last 12 months, which of them added AI subprocessors or reserved the right to train on your data, and where your nth-party exposure concentrates. Free.